What is this thing called Quiet Enjoyment?

Whether in a commercial or residential lease, quiet enjoyment is the most fundamental and often misunderstood right obtained by a tenant.

Many have experienced the situation when loud music or voices have emanated from a neighbouring unit. If banging on the walls, speaking to the property manager or calling the police does not help, is the landlord in breach of its obligation? Is this what is meant by quiet enjoyment?

The covenant of quiet enjoyment means more than just a noise-free environment. It is a more onerous obligation that provides that the landlord will not interfere with a tenant’s right of possession. This covenant has two components:

1. The landlord has good title to the premises, and therefore can lawfully enter into the lease with the tenant, and

2. The landlord will not interfere with the tenant’s enjoyment of the leased premises.

In most leases the covenant is written in the lease document, setting out the parameters for quiet enjoyment.

Defective Title

A tenant is entitled to exclusive possession of the leased premises, without the permission of anyone else. If the tenant needs approval before entering the premises, then the landlord did not have right to grant the exclusive possession to the tenant. The landlord may then be in breach of its covenant.

Practical Tips
In order to ensure that the landlord can validly enter into the lease, a tenant should examine the title to the landlord’s property in order to confirm ownership. This can be done by way of a subsearch of title at the lawyer’s office or a review of the records of the land registry office. The subsearch should confirm that the owner of the property is the landlord as its name is indicated on the lease document. If this is not the case, the tenant should seek clarification. A subsearch would also show whether there are third-parties with an interest in the landlord’s property, for example, if there is a mortgage on title. This may become significant in the event of default by the landlord, as the lender may be able to step into the landlord’s shoes or in some cases terminate the lease before the end of the lease term.

Substantial Interference

There is no clear-cut test to determine whether a landlord has interfered with the tenant’s quiet enjoyment. This issue has gone before the Courts numerous times, but the case law in this area is inconsistent. The following are situations where the Courts have found that the landlord’s actions constituted a substantial interference with the tenant’s quiet enjoyment: a landlord erecting scaffolding in front of a tenant’s store interfering with the tenant’s business, a landlord creating a substantial amount of dirt and dust while undertaking renovations to another unit, a landlord undertaking unannounced and periodic inspections of a tenant’s premise, and consistent interruptions to gas and electricity supply. A breach of the covenant may not be found in all cases. Generally when the interruption is foreseeable or when reasonable care has not been exercised, the landlord may be deemed to have interfered with the tenant’s quiet enjoyment.

It should be noted that the interruption must be more than just an inconvenience or annoyance and, in most cases, must have a physical element to the interference.

What to do if the landlord is in breach?
When a tenant alleges breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, the tenant must choose an appropriate remedy while at the same time avoiding liability under the lease. A tenant may want to stop rent payments until the interference is remedied, with the obligation resuming once the landlord is no longer in breach. Stopping payment of rent is not something that should be taken lightly, and a tenant should consider whether the breach warrants this type of action. It may incite the landlord to claim non-payment of rent or terminate the lease. Accordingly, interrupting rent payments is an action that should never be undertaken without consulting legal counsel.

A tenant may also consider whether to claim damages for abatement of rent, loss of profits, out of pocket expenses, or other damages that flow from the breach. In considering the best course of action, the tenant should also consider whether it wishes to keep the leased premises or terminate the lease.

In the end, if there is a situation that you are unhappy with, you may not have to simply grin and bear it. The right to quiet enjoyment gives a tenant the ability to fight back. However, the fight should not be pursued without professional guidance.

Meredith J. Serota is an associate with BrazeauSeller LLP. Meredith’s practice focuses mainly on Corporate/Commercial transactions, as well as commercial real estate. BrazeauSeller.LLP is an Ottawa business law firm that provides expert legal counsel, innovative solutions and responsive service to its clients. As the exclusive Ottawa member of Meritas Law Firms Worldwide, BrazeauSeller is able to provide its clients with access to trusted, dependable legal representation anywhere in the world, that their business takes them. (613) 237-4000 http://ww.brazeauseller.com

About these ads

13 Responses

  1. I follow your posts for quite a long time and should tell you that your posts are always valuable to readers.
    p.s. Year One is already on the Internet and you can watch it for free.

  2. [...] to be forgotten by the people making these statements are their neighbors right to what is called the quiet enjoyment of their property as well this is why the concept of zoning laws have been [...]

  3. [...] to web 1.What is this thing called Quiet Enjoyment? « LAW INFORMATION Nov 28, 2007 … Whether in a commercial or residential lease, quiet enjoyment is the most [...]

  4. I like it whenever people come together and share opinions.
    Great website, keep it up!

  5. Howdy would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different
    web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most.

    Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a reasonable price?
    Thank you, I appreciate it!

  6. I have been browsing online greater than three hours these days, but I never found any fascinating
    article like yours. It’s pretty price enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the net will be much more helpful than ever before.

  7. Wow!
    Thank you for all of your info on the page What is this thing called Quiet Enjoyment?
    | LAW INFORMATION.
    They are already seriously useful! I really enjoyed checking
    your blog post.

  8. These movies and many other’s with the aim of featured karate take part
    in suit icons and are watched on top of and on top of again by nation who both get pleasure from and
    be thankful for the genre. Liederman, (a fitness pioneer and
    well-known vaudeville strongman) whose philosophy was that a man should be able to swim far enough,
    fun fast and long enough to save their life in case of an emergency and necessity.
    After six months or brutal torture he is found innocent and released but that has
    left scar in his memories and he starts a real terror organization to take revenge of been assaulted devoid of a reason.

  9. ” He is also a man of high ethics though and will not stand for any nonsense. The music tells you that the movie your about to see is a scary one. Bajamos las escaleras, y me di cuenta que haca un poco de fro.

  10. I would flip by it every now and then when it was on TV, and just the image of Michael
    Myers standing behind that clothesline as Jamie Lee Curtis
    stared down at him from her bedroom window was seared into my little brain. Equipped with wings, tutu
    and a magical wand he starts doing what a tooth fairy does and gradually realizes his own lost
    dreams. ” Some sites claim to be legal because they simply link to other sites that actually host the movies.

  11. You can also adjust the aspect through its
    controls, depending on what you’re watching.
    Liederman, (a fitness pioneer and well-known vaudeville strongman) whose philosophy was that a man should be able to swim far enough, fun fast and long enough to save their life in case of an emergency and necessity.
    After six months or brutal torture he is found innocent and released but that has left scar in his memories and he starts a real terror organization to take
    revenge of been assaulted devoid of a reason.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers

%d bloggers like this: